AI ranks top 10 athletes of all time; JBJ makes the list

More evidence AI can be gamed to spit retarded shit

Fighting >> a kids game with a ball

Boxing match. BJB prime vs Ali prime. BJB does not win this

Boxing >> kids game with a ball

Deion ā€œIm scared to tackleā€ Sanders over here likeā€¦

Deion Sanders What GIF by UCHealth

No Neon?

That list is not very good, whatā€™s the criteria? Is Bolt really a top 10 all-time athlete? He is just fast, his sport is basically running. Granted he is the best at what he does but what he does is not more impressive than many names left off the list, Iā€™d even say Mayweather is worthy before Bolt and Iā€™m not sure Floyd makes my top 10. It would be better just to do separate list for each sport because itā€™s hard to compare a sport like running to a more physical sport. Jordan may be #1 without clear criteria.

Bobby Fischer should be on there. This list is antisemitic.

Title should read ā€œComputer Programmer Sets Weighted Criteria to have Computer Rank Athletesā€

People think machine learning is some kind of voodooā€¦.

1 Like

Notice this man has no issue with Lebron on this list.

We Got Him GIF

2 Likes

How can you say that when Tiger is 3 behind Jack Nicklaus in the majors list?

1 Like

The trouble with this list (apart from the obvious fact that time hasnā€™t even finished yet) is that there is no objective criteria given as a metric to differentiate who is a better ā€˜ā€˜athleteā€™ā€™ compared to another.

Why is Messi in that list but not Ronaldo?

How can a Golfer be more athletic than Ronaldo this makes no logical sense.

Djokovic, Federer and Nadal are clearly far more athletic than someone who walks around on a golf course so why are they not on the list either?

1 Like

Awesome seeing Pele on there, but theres definitely a couple that shouldnt be.

Its AI though, so not a bad list considering i guess.

I explained my logic above. I believe Tiger was played against a way larger field of tremendous golfers.

Is Michael Jordan the all time leading scorer?

Modern era golfers who had the benefit of modern technology, science, training methods plus the addition of Physical therapists, Nutritionists, Personal trainers etc etc.

If you gave all that to Jackā€™s generation I believe that not only does their game improve but Jack would actually win more than 18 majors IMHO.

1 Like

Scoring isnā€™t the only metric used to define Jordanā€™s success.

Had he never won a Championship nobody would consider him as the greatest.

1 Like

You stated Jack was better because he had more majors so my counter was essentially like you said. There is more than just one number

Okay but what other numbers does Tiger have that Jack doesnā€™t?

Without championships no-one would consider Jordan as the greatest so Iā€™m curious as to what you think Tiger actually has over Jack here that would be comparable to the majors?

Jack Nicklaus is the GOAT.

My opinion Tiger. Reason is number of wins against what I believe was a larger number of great competitors. Iā€™m not here to try to defend my opinion.

Who is?

I have Ali as the GOAT.

Well thatā€™s debatable of course and as I already said but it isnā€™t an objective metric like the majors.

If Jack and his generation had the benefit of modern technology, science, training methods plus the addition of Physical therapists, Nutritionists, Personal trainers etc they would have been better players as a result and I think Jack would have won more than 18 majors too IMHO.

1 Like